top of page

Invisible Americans:the cost of childhood poverty

by Jeff Madrick

Reviewed by Eileen Quinn Knight, Ph.D.

The author presents very clearly the disaster of childhood poverty. He gives us

the overarching consideration about what we should do as responsible and

respectful citizens. He gives us plenty of information to make some decent

choices for a more merciful and caring society. We have seen through the

pandemic that people really want to help others in need such as the hospital

workers, grocery store workers and all those that have as their goal the assistance

of others. In 1962, Michael Harrington published his groundbreaking exposé on

poverty, “The Other America,” which helped awaken the country to the scourge of

poverty. Yet after six decades, the paradox of poverty amid plenty remains. This

disturbing fact serves as the starting point for Jeff Madrick’s book “Invisible

Americans: the cost of Childhood Poverty”. Madrick’s goal is to reveal the

conditions, causes and costs of poverty, specifically childhood poverty. His

underlying assumption is that if we as a nation truly understood the tragic toll of

child poverty, we would act decisively to alleviate it.

Madrick rightly points out that the United States has the highest rates of child

poverty and deprivation among the wealthy countries in the Organization for

Economic Cooperation and Development. Why should this be? Although many

possible reasons exist, one particularly powerful set of factors is that the nation

has often viewed the poor as undeserving of assistance. This conviction has taken

many forms. One argument is that the poor do not work hard enough and/or

have made bad decisions in life. A second is that the poor are caught in a “culture

of poverty,” in which single parenthood and crime predominate. Yet another set

of beliefs imagines most of the poor to be nonwhite and living off welfare. In all

these cases, the poverty-stricken are disdained as undeserving of compassion or

assistance. They are the ones responsible for their own fate and therefore must

accept the consequences.

Madrick marshals a vast array of social scientific research to show that each of

these beliefs is clearly incorrect. In addition, he describes the human and societal

toll that child poverty produces. For example, he points to a study I undertook

along with Michael McLaughlin of Washington University in St. Louis showing

that childhood poverty costs the United States approximately $1 trillion a year in

increased medical and criminal-justice costs, along with lower economic


Furthermore, Madrick correctly argues that much of American poverty is a result

of failings at a structural rather than an individual level. This includes a lack of

decent-paying jobs, a shortage of affordable child and health care, a shredded

safety net, and so on. To use an analogy, we have focused our attention on who

loses the game, rather than why the game produces losers in the first place.

What then is the answer? Madrick argues that the most straightforward and

effective way to significantly reduce child poverty is through a cash allowance

available to all children. The idea is similar to a universal basic income, a concept

being discussed in progressive circles. Every child would be guaranteed an

income that would be paid to their parents, perhaps $300 to $400 a month.

Through such payments, Madrick argues, child poverty could be cut in half. Many

Western industrialized countries have adopted similar policies, lowering their

poverty rates as a result.

Overall, “Invisible Americans” does an excellent job pulling together and

synthesizing the latest research on the dynamics of child poverty in the United

States. It is a clarion call to address this most unjust blight upon the American

landscape. Madrick has provided a valuable service in presenting a highly

readable and cogent argument for change.

What if factual evidence and arguments do not change hearts and minds? This

book’s method is to provide well-reasoned arguments based on the best available

research. Most policy analysts would strongly argue that we should be guided by

such an approach.

However, it is possible that the myths and misguided beliefs about poverty

benefit many of us, particularly those with influence, which contributes to their

staying power. Clearly the myths surrounding the “welfare freeloader” have been

used by political leaders from Ronald Reagan to Bill Clinton to Donald Trump to

further their careers. Likewise, race has been used strategically by Southern

politicians to divide poor blacks and whites, keeping them from seeing their

common economic interests.

Moreover, such myths let those who are not poor off the hook. “Why should I give

up my hard-earned tax dollars to someone who is not willing to work hard?” is a

frequent refrain. As President Trump remarked at a rally in St. Charles, Mo., two

years ago, “But welfare reform — I see it and I’ve talked to people. I know people,

they work three jobs, and they live next to somebody who doesn’t work at all. And

the person who’s not working at all, and has no intention of working at all, is

making more money and doing better than the person that’s working his and her

ass off. And it’s not going to happen. Not going to happen.” The crowd in

attendance roared its approval. Such attitudes are unlikely to be moved by

arguing for providing poor children and their parents with a monthly cash

stipend, whether working or not.

And yet, as we have seen over the past decade, a shift in our understanding and

response to economic inequality may be in the air. Ultimately poverty affects us

all. Grass-roots groups across the country have been organizing and working to

fundamentally change the conditions that disenfranchise so many Americans,

poor and non-poor alike. They would do well to use “Invisible Americans” as a

launching point. It will greatly effect/affect us as we return after the pandemic.

Recent Posts

See All

Articles/commentaries Former career US diplomat charged with secretly spying for Cuban intelligence for decades by Joshua Goodman and Eric Cutter The Associated Press

bottom of page